A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
✓Claimant Mateo Vargas Pinzon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
- No es oportunidad para corregir o modificar demanda rechazada
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica formulado contra el auto que rechazó parcialmente la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
La Corte constató que el recurso es IMPROCEDENTE, pues no busca controvertir el auto de rechazo por haber incurrido en algún yerro, olvido o arbitrariedad que haga necesaria su revisión por parte de la Sala Plena, sino corregir las deficiencias argumentativas advertidas en esa providencia.
Se CONFIRMA el auto cuestionado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del 23 de abril de 2019 dictado por el magistrado sustanciador Alberto Rojas Rios, por medio del cual rechazo parcialmente la demanda identificada con el numero de radicacion D-13131.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.